$ai-evals
← all companies

Weights & Biases Weave

LLM tracing, evaluation, and prompt management embedded inside the Weights & Biases ML platform.

6.8/10
observabilityLLM evalsprompt managementMLOps·freemiumwandb.ai/site/weave

Verdict

The right pick if your team already lives in Weights & Biases for ML experiment tracking. Adding a second tool for LLM observability when you have a mature W&B workflow is the wrong move — Weave does enough of the job to consolidate. Outside that audience, it's a less compelling all-in-one than Braintrust or Langfuse.

What it is

Weave is the LLM-focused layer on top of Weights & Biases — the same platform many teams already use for ML experiment tracking, model registry, and dataset versioning. Trace LLM calls with the @weave.op decorator, run evaluations, browse leaderboards, and manage prompts alongside the rest of your ML workflow.

Free tier: limited seats, storage, ingestion. Paid from $60/month.

Where it shines

  • Continuity with W&B. If your ML org has been on W&B for years, Weave is the path of least resistance for adding LLM observability.
  • Decorator instrumentation. @weave.op is a clean API — wrap a function, get a trace.
  • Leaderboards. The eval-comparison UI inherits W&B's strong charting heritage.

Where it falls short

  • Standalone product. Weave alone, without W&B context, isn't the strongest pick in any category.
  • PM collaboration. Versioning and review workflows trail the eval-first specialists.
  • LLM-first orientation. It's still an MLOps platform with LLM features, not the other way around.

Bottom line

The right pick if you're already a W&B shop and your LLM work needs to live in the same neighborhood as your ML pipelines. Outside that audience, the LLM specialists (Braintrust, Langfuse) deliver more value per dollar.

Similar tools

Related